House #2 Appaised at $150,000

I got a pleasant suprise this week as I got a copy of the appraisal done for our new equity line on House #2 - $150,000! I orginally paid less than $130,000 back in June 2006 and wasn't expecting any significant increase.

I still don't put alot of faith in apprasials because property is a very illiquid investment. However, when they have an upbeat number I will let myself get a little excited. The good news helps validate my thinking that this property will be a good long term investment.

However it ends there - I'll maintain the cost basis as my valuation of the property in my net worth as I have always believed that its the best way to value these illiquid assets.

Related in Real Estate:

No Closing Cost Loan Example (Nov 29, 2012) I've gotten multiple requests to clarify the recent no closing cost refinance loan I just completed. Its a bit of a vague term and could be done different ways, but the end result is that there are no out of...

3.5% 30 Year Fixed No Closing Cost Refinance (Nov 27, 2012) We finally closed this week on our 3.5% 30 year fixed refinance with no closing costs (no closing costs = a credit from lender/broker large enough to offset refinance costs). It took us over 2 months (67 days from initial...

Appraisal Appeal Unsuccessful (Nov 05, 2012) Not much of a surprise, the appraiser dug in and didn't budge after we submitted our appraisal appeal: Our more favorable comparables were based on county property records. Interestingly the appraiser indicated the MLS data is generally considered more accurate...

Comments (9)

Hate to burst your bubble but of COURSE they're going to appraise your house higher than what it would actually sell for. It's called more PROPERTY TAX for the government. If you want a fairly honest estimate, I would check out and I would be looking at similar size homes that have actually SOLD recently in your area. That would tell you a more realistic estimate.

One more thing I forgot to post is just to think for a second. Do you honestly believe that a house bought in 2006 at the absolute HEIGHT of the bubble is going to be worth 20K more than now? I mean this is exactly why the real estate crisis is going to last for years because people think their homes are worth more than they are and because the gov't tries to convince you it IS worth more so you can give them more money. It's a vicious cycle.

Steve: I assume the local tax assessing authority is not providing appraisals for HELOCs. The bank "performs" the appraisal and the bank wants to have collateral for the loans they provide. I don't see any incentive to highly overvalue an asset in the current lending situation. The higher the value the larger the loan and the more interest they can collect, but I don't think your first comment has any validity at all.

Steve - It seems like you've been drinking the Armaggedon news cool-aid a little too much lately. Yes we are in a terrible economic cycle, but just because you read that real estate values have plummeted in the US, does not mean that each property has decreased. 2Million may have done some significant improvements (new driveway, siding, etc.). A new school could have been built in the neighborhood, the appraiser might have switched to the income approach in his appraisal since it is now a rental. There are hundreds of ways a property could increase in value, even during this type of market. At least in my state (and the other 49 i am sure), the appraisers have ZERO incentive to arbitrarily inflate appraised values to help "the government" and increase property taxes. The only incentive that they have, which is a shaky argument, is that they could inflate prices to ensure that the mortgage lenders continue to use their business (which is now being outlawed Appraisers are being reprimanded right now for being overly cautious and bringing values that are lower than they should be.

Anyways - Congrats 2Million! It is always wise to keep your values lower on the net worth sheet than the appraisal because if you needed to move the property quickly, you would likely have to lower the price, and take the selling/broker costs into account as well which can ofter wipe out a good portion of equity.

My argument is perfectly sound people! PERFECTLY sound. This is the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. Average house values in the US have sunk 30% since their 2006 highs. Unemployment rate is rising. That's over 10%. Yet you think that 2million's home is somehow bucking this trend? Hey I have nothing personal against 2million and would love his house to be worth what the latest assessment says and I love his blog. Only problem is, this is not a realistic assessment. The only way to solve this argument is to put the house up for sale today at the currently appraised price and see if anybody buys at that price. I say no. You say yes. That's the only way to know.

The government and his property tax assesment had nothing to do with 2 mill's recent apprasial. I love people that have no facts yet spout like ignorant

Now if he got a notice in the mail that his property from the county tax collector that his home was being reassessed at a higher value. Then your argument holds water.

Where are those breadlines...steve? not in here in the US. Trust me son, the 70's were much worse then this. All this was, was the the opportunity to load up on cheap assets (stocks and RE).

It might get worse, it might not.

Who within your means and provide value to something or some one and you can make money!

Steve, it was not an ASSESSMENT it was an apprasial. Look up the definitions.

Steve, your argument is NOT PERFECTLY sound. There ARE DEFINATELY places in the US were house prices are increasing? Just because on average prices are down 30% it does NOT mean all house values are down. I think 2million house price MIGHT be bucking the trend.

2million do not worry, just to prove Steve right, you do NOT need to sell your home.

The main question for me is: can people who live in the neighborhood afford houses at the higher value? It's when the houses become too expensive vs the occupants incomes (renters or owners), that the price will fall. The 20K difference isn't so much and might be realistic if wages haven't gone down in the area.

A few years ago, I would track unbooked equity (in a home) based on sales values on my personal balance sheet. That being said, the value of a home, be it a first or second, has less meaning for me. I mostly want to see how much cash it generates and how that augments my investment income. For example, if I have 10K in net rental income, 10K in investment income and 40K in expenses, then I only need to earn 20K to break-even. 2million seems to want to cover his monthly/annual costs so he might want to track that ratio.

Post a comment

(Comment moderation enabled.)


A personal finance weblog of my journey to reach my goal of $2 million + the value of my primary residence.
Current Net Worth: $1,938,393


New Personal Finance Articles

PF Blogs